Anderson v. Saif Corp.

680 P.2d 391, 68 Or. App. 48, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3240
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 2, 1984
Docket82-02459; CA A29098
StatusPublished

This text of 680 P.2d 391 (Anderson v. Saif Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Saif Corp., 680 P.2d 391, 68 Or. App. 48, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3240 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant appeals from a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order affirming and adopting a decision of the referee. Recitation of the facts, and of the contentions of the parties, would not benefit bench or bar. We modify the “ORDER” portion of the referee’s decision by deleting from the first paragraph thereof the words, “* * * and reopen the same at the time claimant submits to the surgery proposed by Dr. Poulson.” The case is remanded to the Board for further proceedings to determine to what compensation, if any, claimant is entitled.

Order modified to eliminate provision concerning surgery; remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
680 P.2d 391, 68 Or. App. 48, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-saif-corp-orctapp-1984.