Anderson v. Saif Corp.
This text of 680 P.2d 391 (Anderson v. Saif Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Claimant appeals from a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order affirming and adopting a decision of the referee. Recitation of the facts, and of the contentions of the parties, would not benefit bench or bar. We modify the “ORDER” portion of the referee’s decision by deleting from the first paragraph thereof the words, “* * * and reopen the same at the time claimant submits to the surgery proposed by Dr. Poulson.” The case is remanded to the Board for further proceedings to determine to what compensation, if any, claimant is entitled.
Order modified to eliminate provision concerning surgery; remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
680 P.2d 391, 68 Or. App. 48, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-saif-corp-orctapp-1984.