Anderson v. Robson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Anderson v. Robson

2 S.C.L. 495

DecidedJuly 1, 1803

StatusPublished

This text of 2 S.C.L. 495 (Anderson v. Robson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Robson, 2 S.C.L. 495 (S.C. Ct. App. 1803).

Pincite

Opinion

The court,

after hearing arguments on both sides, was of opinion, that the case was very properly submitted, under all the circumstances of the case, by the presiding judge to the jury, who had found a verdict for the plaintiffs; and as the loss of the original hill was a matter for their consideration, arising from the nature of the evidence offered, and the whole of the case together, the court did not think proper to disturb the verdict.

Rule for new trial discharged.

All the Judges present.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court,

after hearing arguments on both sides, was of opinion, that the case was very properly submitted, under all the circumstances of the case, by the presiding judge to the jury, who had found a verdict for the plaintiffs; and as the loss of the original hill was a matter for their consideration, arising from the nature of the evidence offered, and the whole of the case together, the court did not think proper to disturb the verdict.

Rule for new trial discharged.

All the Judges present.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 S.C.L. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-robson-scctapp-1803.