Anderson v. Riggs

Idaho Supreme Court

Anderson v. Riggs

233 P.2d 422, 71 Idaho 420, 1951 Ida. LEXIS 300

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedJune 27, 1951

DocketNo. 7747

StatusPublished

This text of 233 P.2d 422 (Anderson v. Riggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Riggs, 233 P.2d 422, 71 Idaho 420, 1951 Ida. LEXIS 300 (Idaho 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

GIVENS, Chief Justice.

This is a companion case to A. & H. Food Market, Inc. v. Riggs, 71 Idaho 416, 233 P.2d 420. The only difference between the two is that in this case the aggregate assessment against the petitioner-merchants was certified by the County Board of Commissioners to the State Tax Commission as $373,011, which was by appellant Commission increased in the sum of $186,505, making a total of $559,516 and so certified by the State Tax Commission to the County. The total amount was paid by the petitioner merchants and thereafter, one-third thereof was refunded to the petitioner-merchants by the County of Kootenai, and subsequent proceedings were identical with those detailed in Case No. 7746.

Upon the authority of that case, the Order striking the Complaint in Intervention herein is affirmed. Costs awarded to petitioners-respondents.

PORTER, TAYLOR, THOMAS and KEETON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIVENS, Chief Justice.

This is a companion case to A. & H. Food Market, Inc. v. Riggs, 71 Idaho 416, 233 P.2d 420. The only difference between the two is that in this case the aggregate assessment against the petitioner-merchants was certified by the County Board of Commissioners to the State Tax Commission as $373,011, which was by appellant Commission increased in the sum of $186,505, making a total of $559,516 and so certified by the State Tax Commission to the County. The total amount was paid by the petitioner merchants and thereafter, one-third thereof was refunded to the petitioner-merchants by the County of Kootenai, and subsequent proceedings were identical with those detailed in Case No. 7746.

Upon the authority of that case, the Order striking the Complaint in Intervention herein is affirmed. Costs awarded to petitioners-respondents.

PORTER, TAYLOR, THOMAS and KEETON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 P.2d 422, 71 Idaho 420, 1951 Ida. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-riggs-idaho-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack