Anderson v. Richards

22 Ill. 217
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 Ill. 217 (Anderson v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Richards, 22 Ill. 217 (Ill. 1859).

Opinion

Breese, J.

The demurrer was properly overruled, it being to the whole declaration, and the common counts therein being good. The rule is, where there is a general demurrer to a declaration containing several counts, if there be one or more good counts, the demurrer must be overruled. Cowles v. Litchfield, 2 Scam. R. 356 ; Young v. Campbell, 5 Gilm. R. 82 ; Walter v. Stephenson, 14 Ill. R. 77.

This being so, the defective special counts are both saved. Besides, “ mala grammatica non vitial chartamJ There being no error assigned which we can notice, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolf v. City of Alton
103 Ill. App. 587 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Ill. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-richards-ill-1859.