Anderson v. Rawlings
This text of 18 Ohio C.C. 381 (Anderson v. Rawlings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment in this case is reversed on the ground that the petition fails to state a cause of action against the plaintiff in error in this, that it contains no averment that plaintiff in error did the act complained of, or that the ticket agent was authorized by plaintiff in error to do such act, or that he was acting within the scope of his authority therein —i. e,, in making the unlawful discrimination complained, of.
Whether allegation and proof that the ticket agent was. given authority to exercise his own discretion in selling or refusing to sell tickets to persons applying therefor would be sufficient to charge the principal with liability for such act as that complained of, we do not decide.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Ohio C.C. 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-rawlings-ohiocirct-1899.