Anderson v. Rawlings
This text of 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 112 (Anderson v. Rawlings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
'The judgment in this case is reversed on the ground that the petition fails to state a cause of action against the plaintiff in error' in this, that it contains no averments that plaintiff in error did the act complained of, or that the ticket agent was authorized by plaintiff in error to do such act or that he was acting within the scope of his authority therein — i. e., in making the unlawful discrimination complained of.
Whether allegation and proof that the ticket agent was given authority to exercise his own discretion in selling or refusing to sell tickets to persons applying therefor would be sufficient to charge the principal with liability for such act as that complained of, we do not decide.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-rawlings-ohcircthamilton-1899.