Anderson v. Pruitt

529 F. App'x 341
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2013·No. No. 13-6570·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Anderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny reconsideration of the court’s earlier order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Pruitt, No. 1:10-cv-00553-NCT-JEP (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2013). We dispense [342] with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. Pruitt, 529 F. App'x 341 (4th Cir. 2013).

529 F. App'x 341 (Anderson v. Pruitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawton v. Camp Lejeune Toxic Water
E.D. North Carolina, 2023