Anderson v. Pilot House of St. Petersburg, Inc.
This text of 559 So. 2d 419 (Anderson v. Pilot House of St. Petersburg, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael J. ANDERSON and Michaeljay, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellants,
v.
PILOT HOUSE OF ST. PETERSBURG, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Raymond C. Conklin, Clearwater, for appellants.
David A. Eaton of David A. Eaton, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellee.
HALL, Judge.
The appellants raise several points on appeal. We find merit only in the appellants' argument as to attorney's fees.
The appellants contend the trial court erred in its award of attorney's fees by failing to make written findings under Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1985).
We agree and remand for the entry of written findings according to Rowe; otherwise, we affirm the judgment.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
559 So. 2d 419, 1990 WL 41228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-pilot-house-of-st-petersburg-inc-fladistctapp-1990.