Anderson v. Peterson
265 P. 1118, 147 Wash. 698, 1928 Wash. LEXIS 1018
Opinion
This is a companion case to Anderson v. National Bank of Tacoma, reported in 146 Wash. 520, 264 Pac. 8, differing only in that the checks involved in this transaction were slightly subsequent in time, and in the former action the bank on which the checks were drawn had also been made a party defendant. In the former opinion there is a full discussion both of the facts and the law. No other or different conclusion can be reached than the one there expressed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Peterson, 265 P. 1118, 147 Wash. 698, 1928 Wash. LEXIS 1018 (Wash. 1928).
265 P. 1118 (Anderson v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anderson v. National Bank of Tacoma
264 P. 8 (Washington Supreme Court, 1928)