Anderson v. Peterson
This text of 147 N.W. 426 (Anderson v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question presented in this case is whether the version of the transaction given by plaintiff or that given by defendant is correct. They flatly contradict each other. It is the province of the jury to determine controverted ques[535]*535tions of fact, and tlieir decision, if reasonably supported by the evidence, is binding upon the court. The disputed questions were properly submitted to the jury and they have found in favor of plaintiff. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the record discloses no ground which will justify this court in setting it aside.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 N.W. 426, 125 Minn. 534, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-peterson-minn-1914.