Anderson v. People

Illinois Supreme Court

Anderson v. People

63 Ill. 53

DecidedJanuary 15, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 63 Ill. 53 (Anderson v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. People, 63 Ill. 53 (Ill. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an indictment for selling liquor without a license, on which the defendant was convicted.

The statute provides that every person not having a legal license to keep a grocery, who shall barter, sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of, for his gain or benefit, any vinous, spirituous or mixed liquors, in less quantities than a gallon, or shall permit the same to be done on his premises, for his gain and benefit, shall forfeit, etc.

It is objected that the indictment does not aver that the defendant sold the liquor for his gain or benefit, or that he sold it upon his premises. Neither averment was necessary. The words “ for his gain or benefit,” used in the statute, do not apply to the words “ barter, sell, exchange,” but to the phrase “ otherwise dispose of,” which immediately precedes the words in question, and is to be read in connection with them alone. So of the phrase “ on his premises.” This has no application to the man who sells, but only to him who “ permits ” the sale. The construction in both these matters is so plain that discussion is unnecessary.

The instructions did not mislead, and the evidence sustains the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an indictment for selling liquor without a license, on which the defendant was convicted.

The statute provides that every person not having a legal license to keep a grocery, who shall barter, sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of, for his gain or benefit, any vinous, spirituous or mixed liquors, in less quantities than a gallon, or shall permit the same to be done on his premises, for his gain and benefit, shall forfeit, etc.

It is objected that the indictment does not aver that the defendant sold the liquor for his gain or benefit, or that he sold it upon his premises. Neither averment was necessary. The words “ for his gain or benefit,” used in the statute, do not apply to the words “ barter, sell, exchange,” but to the phrase “ otherwise dispose of,” which immediately precedes the words in question, and is to be read in connection with them alone. So of the phrase “ on his premises.” This has no application to the man who sells, but only to him who “ permits ” the sale. The construction in both these matters is so plain that discussion is unnecessary.

The instructions did not mislead, and the evidence sustains the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 Ill. 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-people-ill-1872.