Anderson v. Oneida Rational Bank & Trust Co.
This text of 284 A.D. 829 (Anderson v. Oneida Rational Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs [830]*830of these appeals to either party. All concur. (Cross appeals from an order denying motions under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice by plaintiff and by defendant for summary judgment in an action to recover fees for legal services.) Present — McCum, P. J., Kimball, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 A.D. 829, 131 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-oneida-rational-bank-trust-co-nyappdiv-1954.