Anderson v. Olin

44 Ill. App. 294, 1892 Ill. App. LEXIS 593
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 29, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 44 Ill. App. 294 (Anderson v. Olin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Olin, 44 Ill. App. 294, 1892 Ill. App. LEXIS 593 (Ill. Ct. App. 1892).

Opinion

Gary, J.

This is an attempt by the appellant to avoid by another bill in chancery the effect of a former suit to which he was a party, served with process, and which he neglected.

Probably we should find little difficulty in showing that the decree dismissing- the bill is right, if the question were before us; but no errors being assigned upon the record, although the appellees call attention in their brief to the omission, and the appellant files a reply, we can only dismiss the appeal without costs. Waixel v. Harrison, 35 Ill. App. 571.

Appeal dismissed.

Judge Shepard takes no part in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waixel v. Harrison
35 Ill. App. 571 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Ill. App. 294, 1892 Ill. App. LEXIS 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-olin-illappct-1892.