Anderson v. Nebraska

Eighth Circuit

Anderson v. Nebraska

668 F.2d 349

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 18, 1981

DocketNo. 81-2036

StatusPublished

This text of 668 F.2d 349 (Anderson v. Nebraska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Nebraska, 668 F.2d 349 (8th Cir. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Durl F. Anderson, dissatisfied with the progress of his marriage dissolution proceedings in state court, attempted to remove the matter to federal court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), the federal district court remanded the proceedings to state court and the appellant appeals. Various defendants move to dismiss on the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction. Based on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court and on this court’s opinion in Milligan v. Milligan, 484 F.2d 446 (8th Cir. 1973), the motion to dismiss should be, and hereby is, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Durl F. Anderson, dissatisfied with the progress of his marriage dissolution proceedings in state court, attempted to remove the matter to federal court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), the federal district court remanded the proceedings to state court and the appellant appeals. Various defendants move to dismiss on the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction. Based on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court and on this court’s opinion in Milligan v. Milligan, 484 F.2d 446 (8th Cir. 1973), the motion to dismiss should be, and hereby is, granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

668 F.2d 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-nebraska-ca8-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack