Anderson v. National Heritage Foundation, Inc. (In re Anderson)

439 F. App'x 238
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJuly 13, 2011
DocketNo. 10-2186
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 439 F. App'x 238 (Anderson v. National Heritage Foundation, Inc. (In re Anderson)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. National Heritage Foundation, Inc. (In re Anderson), 439 F. App'x 238 (U.S. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dolores F. Anderson and the Dodie Anderson Foundation appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of their motion for leave to file a proof of claim beyond the bar date and the disallowance of their claim in the bankruptcy case of National Heritage Foundation, Inc. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant National Heritage Foundation’s motion to submit the appeal on the briefs and affirm for the reasons stated by the lower courts. Anderson v. Nat’l Heritage Found., Inc., No. 1:10-cv-00039-CMH-IDD (E.D.Va., Sept. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Behrmann v. National Heritage Foundation, Inc.
663 F.3d 704 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 F. App'x 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-national-heritage-foundation-inc-in-re-anderson-scotus-2011.