Anderson v. Moats
This text of Anderson v. Moats (Anderson v. Moats) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7350
PHOENIX ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALAN MOATS, Judge; LEONARD LUCAS, Magistrate; HOWARD FERRIS, Attorney; JIM SHACKELFORD, (Shackelford Bonding); ROGER HICKMAN, (Shackelford Bonding); CAROL S. BIRDSELL, Court Reporter; ELAINE BENNETT, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Taylor County; JOHN L. BORD, Prosecutor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-152-1)
Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 2, 2005
Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phoenix Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Phoenix Anderson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v.
Moats, No. CA-03-152-1 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 3, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson v. Moats, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-moats-ca4-2005.