Anderson v. Minnesota Steel Co.
This text of 200 N.W. 475 (Anderson v. Minnesota Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Commission denying relator’s claim for compensation.
The relator is suffering from diabetes but was not afflicted with the disease until several months after the accident out of which the claim arises. The record presents the simple issue of fact, affirmed by relator’s evidence and denied by that for respondent, whether the disease was caused by the injury. Upon conflicting evidence, the referee found that it was not. The Industrial Commission reached the same conclusion. In such a situation we are not at liberty to interfere with the result.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 N.W. 475, 160 Minn. 410, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-minnesota-steel-co-minn-1924.