Anderson v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Anderson v. Meyer

150 N.W. 1102, 128 Minn. 534, 1915 Minn. LEXIS 986

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 29, 1915

DocketNos. 18,981-(191)

StatusPublished

This text of 150 N.W. 1102 (Anderson v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Meyer, 150 N.W. 1102, 128 Minn. 534, 1915 Minn. LEXIS 986 (Mich. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Action of unlawful detainer commenced before a justice of the peace and tried de novo upon appeal to the district court, where there was judgment for tile plaintiff for restitution from which the defendants appeal.

The evidence is not before us. The findings are inconsistent; but upon a consideration of them we think it must be held that the plaintiff, who took title by descent in 1910, at which time the defendants were holding over after the expiration of a leasehold interest, thereafter and in 1911 made a lease to the defendants of certain premises, including a part of the premises leased them by her ancestor, and certain premises additional thereto, at an increased rental, this lease- being from month to month. A month’s notice to quit was given and this entitled the plaintiff to possession.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Action of unlawful detainer commenced before a justice of the peace and tried de novo upon appeal to the district court, where there was judgment for tile plaintiff for restitution from which the defendants appeal.

The evidence is not before us. The findings are inconsistent; but upon a consideration of them we think it must be held that the plaintiff, who took title by descent in 1910, at which time the defendants were holding over after the expiration of a leasehold interest, thereafter and in 1911 made a lease to the defendants of certain premises, including a part of the premises leased them by her ancestor, and certain premises additional thereto, at an increased rental, this lease- being from month to month. A month’s notice to quit was given and this entitled the plaintiff to possession.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 N.W. 1102, 128 Minn. 534, 1915 Minn. LEXIS 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-meyer-minn-1915.