Anderson v. Mendez, Warden

538 U.S. 1028, 123 S. Ct. 2105
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 19, 2003·No. 02-9895·Published

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As *1029 petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. Mendez, Warden, 538 U.S. 1028, 123 S. Ct. 2105 (2003).

538 U.S. 1028 (Anderson v. Mendez, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)