Anderson v. Meister
Opinion
- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Ronald Anderson, ) ) FILED Plaintiff, ) FEB 2 0 2009 ) v. ) Civil Action No. NANCY MAYER WHmINGTON. ClERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT ) ) Ann Meister et aI., ) 09 0338 ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and application
to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be
dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring dismissal of a prisoner's complaint upon a
determination that the complaint, among other grounds, seeks monetary relief from an immune
defendant).
Plaintiff is a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary McCreary in Pine Knot, Kentucky.
He sues the Register of Wills for the District of Columbia and her deputy for rejecting his
"Petition for Probate" of his mother's estate. Claiming that the defendants have deprived him of
his First Amendment right to seek redress, plaintiff seeks monetary damages totaling $110,000.
Like judges, court officials "are absolutely immune from liability for damages" under 42 U .S.C.
§ 1983 for actions taken, as alleged here, within the scope of their official duties as "an integral
part of the judicial process." Sindram v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459,1460 (D.C. Cir. 1993). The
complaint therefore is dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
L/~L 6 HVKI~ Date: February JU, 2009 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Meister (Anderson v. Meister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.