Anderson v. McMichael

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Anderson v. McMichael

6 Pa. Super. 114, 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 13, 1897·No. Appeal, No. 154·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The question raised by the motion to quash is ruled by our decision in Yost v. Davison, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, and the cases there cited, and needs no discussion. The order appealed from is neither a final judgment nor an order in the nature of a final judgment, but is interlocutory, and from it an independent appeal does not lie.

The appeal is quashed at the cost of the appellant and the record remitted with a procedendo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The question raised by the motion to quash is ruled by our decision in Yost v. Davison, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, and the cases there cited, and needs no discussion. The order appealed from is neither a final judgment nor an order in the nature of a final judgment, but is interlocutory, and from it an independent appeal does not lie.

The appeal is quashed at the cost of the appellant and the record remitted with a procedendo.

Anderson v. McMichael, 6 Pa. Super. 114, 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319 (Pa. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

6 Pa. Super. 114 (Anderson v. McMichael) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related