Anderson v. McMichael

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Anderson v. McMichael

6 Pa. Super. 114, 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 13, 1897

DocketAppeal, No. 154

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 Pa. Super. 114 (Anderson v. McMichael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. McMichael, 6 Pa. Super. 114, 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319 (Pa. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The question raised by the motion to quash is ruled by our decision in Yost v. Davison, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, and the cases there cited, and needs no discussion. The order appealed from is neither a final judgment nor an order in the nature of a final judgment, but is interlocutory, and from it an independent appeal does not lie.

The appeal is quashed at the cost of the appellant and the record remitted with a procedendo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The question raised by the motion to quash is ruled by our decision in Yost v. Davison, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, and the cases there cited, and needs no discussion. The order appealed from is neither a final judgment nor an order in the nature of a final judgment, but is interlocutory, and from it an independent appeal does not lie.

The appeal is quashed at the cost of the appellant and the record remitted with a procedendo.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Pa. Super. 114, 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-mcmichael-pasuperct-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack