Anderson v. McAfoos
13 A.3d 462, 608 Pa. 567, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 203
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 28, 2011
Docket158 WAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 13 A.3d 462 (Anderson v. McAfoos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Anderson v. McAfoos, 13 A.3d 462, 608 Pa. 567, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 203 (Pa. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of January 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:
a. When should the defendant raise an objection to the plaintiffs expert’s qualifications under the MCARE Act?
b. Whether a board certified pathologist may, under Section 512 of the MCARE Act, testify regarding a general surgeon/treating physician’s standard of care in deciding to discharge a patient without reading the patient’s blood work results?
This case is to be consolidated for oral argument with 1 EAP 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Anderson v. McAfoos
57 A.3d 1141 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 A.3d 462, 608 Pa. 567, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-mcafoos-pa-2011.