Anderson v. Maxwell

226 N.E.2d 103, 10 Ohio St. 2d 188, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 196, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 390
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 3, 1967
DocketNos. 40586, 40611, 40617, 40785, 40786, 40824, 40825, 40860 and 40874
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 226 N.E.2d 103 (Anderson v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Maxwell, 226 N.E.2d 103, 10 Ohio St. 2d 188, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 196, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 390 (Ohio 1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In each of these actions in habeas corpus, the petitioner is being held pursuant to a judgment of conviction of a court of record which had jurisdiction to render the judgment. In each of these cases, the petitioner has sought and been denied relief under the postconviction statutes, and is seeking the same relief in habeas corpus.

The petitioners are remanded to custody on the authority of Freeman v. Maxwell, Warden, 4 Ohio St. 2d 4.

Petitioners remanded to custody.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Creech
2020 Ohio 582 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
Blackburn v. Jago
529 N.E.2d 929 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
State ex rel. Burch v. Morris
494 N.E.2d 1137 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1986)
Stahl v. Shoemaker
364 N.E.2d 286 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1977)
In re Copley
278 N.E.2d 358 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1972)
Knox v. Maxwell
277 F. Supp. 593 (N.D. Ohio, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 N.E.2d 103, 10 Ohio St. 2d 188, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 196, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-maxwell-ohio-1967.