Anderson v. Maxwell
226 N.E.2d 103, 10 Ohio St. 2d 188, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 196, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 390
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 3, 1967·No. Nos. 40586, 40611, 40617, 40785, 40786, 40824, 40825, 40860 and 40874·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
In each of these actions in habeas corpus, the petitioner is being held pursuant to a judgment of conviction of a court of record which had jurisdiction to render the judgment. In each of these cases, the petitioner has sought and been denied relief under the postconviction statutes, and is seeking the same relief in habeas corpus.
The petitioners are remanded to custody on the authority of Freeman v. Maxwell, Warden, 4 Ohio St. 2d 4.
Petitioners remanded to custody.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Maxwell, 226 N.E.2d 103, 10 Ohio St. 2d 188, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 196, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 390 (Ohio 1967).
226 N.E.2d 103 (Anderson v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Creech
2020 Ohio 582 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
Blackburn v. Jago
529 N.E.2d 929 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
State ex rel. Burch v. Morris
494 N.E.2d 1137 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1986)
Stahl v. Shoemaker
364 N.E.2d 286 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1977)
In re Copley
278 N.E.2d 358 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1972)
Knox v. Maxwell
277 F. Supp. 593 (N.D. Ohio, 1967)