Anderson v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJanuary 15, 2014
Docket20-1786
StatusUnpublished

This text of Anderson v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation (Anderson v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Case: 14-1117 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 01/15/2014

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MUFFIN FAYE ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2014-1117 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:12-cv-01979- RAJ, Judge Richard A. Jones. ______________________

ON MOTION ______________________

ORDER Muffin Faye Anderson moves for leave to file her informal brief out of time. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. Anderson’s brief is accepted for filing. Kimberly-Clark Corporation should calculate the Case: 14-1117 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 01/15/2014

due date for its response brief from the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s21

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anderson v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-kimberly-clark-corporation-cafc-2014.