Anderson v. Ketchmark

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 16-JUL-2026 10:06 AM Dkt. 37 SO NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

TRULA ANDERSON, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. TRUMAN LEE KETCHMARK, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Leonard and Hiraoka, JJ.) On April 19, 2024, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant

Truman Lee Ketchmark (Ketchmark), self-represented, filed an

appeal from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (Circuit

Court) in 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX. This court construes the notice of

appeal as appealing from the Circuit Court's April 5, 2024

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order (FOFs, COLs &

Order), which is not a final, appealable order or judgment. On

April 27, 2026, this court entered an Order for Temporary Remand.

On May 18, 2026, a Final Judgment was entered by the Circuit

Court.1

The FOFs, COLs & Order was entered after a jury-waived

trial. On appeal, Ketchmark fails to identify any points of

error. Ketchmark does not challenge any of the Circuit Court's

1 The Honorable Lisa W. Cataldo presided. NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

FOFs or COLs. Ketchmark makes no discernible argument that the

Circuit Court erred in entering judgment against him. Upon

review, we conclude that there is no basis for appellate relief.

Accordingly, the Circuit Court's May 18, 2026 Final

Judgment is affirmed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, July 16, 2026.

On the briefs: /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge Truman Lee Ketchmark, Defendant/Counterclaimant- /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Appellant, self-represented Associate Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge