Anderson v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Anderson v. Kaplan

12 A.D.2d 868, 210 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13041

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 868 (Anderson v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Kaplan, 12 A.D.2d 868, 210 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of a Special Term, Supreme Court, Albany County. Respondents, after examination of petitioner, have found her disqualified on physical grounds. Without alleging that she meets the physical standards of eligibility for the civil service position here in issue, petitioner seeks an order directed to the respondents to place her on an eligible list. Her factual pleading to support this is merely that the details of the physical examination have not been disclosed to her. Whatever other relief petitioner may have to compel or require such disclosure, the mere absence of detailed disclosure does not entitle her on the face of this pleading to be placed on an eligible list. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of a Special Term, Supreme Court, Albany County. Respondents, after examination of petitioner, have found her disqualified on physical grounds. Without alleging that she meets the physical standards of eligibility for the civil service position here in issue, petitioner seeks an order directed to the respondents to place her on an eligible list. Her factual pleading to support this is merely that the details of the physical examination have not been disclosed to her. Whatever other relief petitioner may have to compel or require such disclosure, the mere absence of detailed disclosure does not entitle her on the face of this pleading to be placed on an eligible list. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 868, 210 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-kaplan-nyappdiv-1961.