Anderson v. Jones
This text of 2 Monag. 411 (Anderson v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case, like Rhine’s Appeal, just decided, [the preceding case] was an attempt to get a judgment opened upon the ground of fraud in the procuring of said judgment, and upon the unsupported oath of the petitioner, flatly contradicted in all its material averments. The action of the court below was clearly right, and the discussion of the assignments of error would be a mere waste of time.
Decree affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants. h. j. l.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Monag. 411, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-jones-pa-1889.