Anderson v. Johnson
390 U.S. 456, 88 S. Ct. 1194, 20 L. Ed. 2d 27, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2121
Opinion
Four members of the Court would reverse. Four members of the Court would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. Consequently, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit remains in effect.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Johnson, 390 U.S. 456, 88 S. Ct. 1194, 20 L. Ed. 2d 27, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2121 (1968).
390 U.S. 456 (Anderson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carl H. Smith, II v. Michael J. Cunningham, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison
782 F.2d 292 (First Circuit, 1986)
Crawford v. Linahan
253 S.E.2d 171 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
United States Ex Rel. Stephen Radich v. The Criminal Court of the City of New York
459 F.2d 745 (Second Circuit, 1972)
Hale v. Henderson
336 F. Supp. 512 (W.D. Tennessee, 1972)
Archie Nathaniel Biggers v. William S. Neil, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary, Nashville, Tennessee
448 F.2d 91 (Sixth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Z. T. Osborn, Jr., Z. T. Osborn, Jr. v. United States
415 F.2d 1021 (Sixth Circuit, 1969)
Robert Emanuel Sciberras v. United States
404 F.2d 247 (Tenth Circuit, 1968)