Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Anderson v. Johnson

Anderson v. Johnson

998 P.2d 742, 166 Or. App. 171, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 360
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 8, 2000
Docket96-01-27767M; CA A106495
StatusPublished

This text of 998 P.2d 742 (Anderson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Johnson, 998 P.2d 742, 166 Or. App. 171, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 360 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Judgment imposing expenses and compensation for court-appointed attorney vacated. Alexander v. Johnson, 164 Or App 235, 990 P2d 929 (1999); otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. Johnson
990 P.2d 929 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
998 P.2d 742, 166 Or. App. 171, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-johnson-orctapp-2000.