Home/Supreme Court/Anderson v. Inhabitants of Bordentown

Anderson v. Inhabitants of Bordentown

223 U.S. 714, 56 L. Ed. 626, 32 S. Ct. 521, 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2272
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 15, 1912
DocketNo. 803
StatusPublished

This text of 223 U.S. 714 (Anderson v. Inhabitants of Bordentown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Inhabitants of Bordentown, 223 U.S. 714, 56 L. Ed. 626, 32 S. Ct. 521, 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2272 (1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed

for the want of jurisdiction. St. Paul &c. R. R. Co. v. County of Todd, 142 U. S. 282; St. Paul Gas Light Co. v. St. Paul, 181 U. S. 142; New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336, 350, and cases cited; Hamblin v. Western Land Co., 147 U. S. 531; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co. v. Los Angeles, 217 U. S. 217, 226.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Todd County
142 U.S. 282 (Supreme Court, 1892)
Hamblin v. Western Land Co.
147 U.S. 531 (Supreme Court, 1893)
St. Paul Gas Light Co. v. St. Paul
181 U.S. 142 (Supreme Court, 1901)
New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana
185 U.S. 336 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co. v. City of Los Angeles
217 U.S. 217 (Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 U.S. 714, 56 L. Ed. 626, 32 S. Ct. 521, 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-inhabitants-of-bordentown-scotus-1912.