Anderson v. Inhabitants of Bordentown
223 U.S. 714, 56 L. Ed. 626, 32 S. Ct. 521, 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2272
Opinion
Writ of error dismissed
for the want of jurisdiction. St. Paul &c. R. R. Co. v. County of Todd, 142 U. S. 282; St. Paul Gas Light Co. v. St. Paul, 181 U. S. 142; New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336, 350, and cases cited; Hamblin v. Western Land Co., 147 U. S. 531; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co. v. Los Angeles, 217 U. S. 217, 226.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Inhabitants of Bordentown, 223 U.S. 714, 56 L. Ed. 626, 32 S. Ct. 521, 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2272 (1912).
223 U.S. 714 (Anderson v. Inhabitants of Bordentown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Todd County
142 U.S. 282 (Supreme Court, 1892)
Hamblin v. Western Land Co.
147 U.S. 531 (Supreme Court, 1893)
St. Paul Gas Light Co. v. St. Paul
181 U.S. 142 (Supreme Court, 1901)
New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana
185 U.S. 336 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co. v. City of Los Angeles
217 U.S. 217 (Supreme Court, 1910)