Anderson v. Hultberg

Supreme Court

Anderson v. Hultberg

238 U.S. 605, 35 S. Ct. 418

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 23, 1915

DocketNo. 335

StatusPublished

This text of 238 U.S. 605 (Anderson v. Hultberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Hultberg, 238 U.S. 605, 35 S. Ct. 418 (1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. Axel Chytraus, Mr. John J. Healy and Mr. E. Allen Frost for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. John Barton Payne, Mr. Silas H. Strawn, Mr. Harris F. Williams and Mr. James Hamilton Lewis for the defendants in error.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Railway, 228 U. S. 596, 600; see White Star Mining Co. v. Hultberg, 205 U. S. 540; Anderson et al. v. Swedish Evangelical Mission Covenant of America et al., 235 U. S. 692.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Mr. Axel Chytraus, Mr. John J. Healy and Mr. E. Allen Frost for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. John Barton Payne, Mr. Silas H. Strawn, Mr. Harris F. Williams and Mr. James Hamilton Lewis for the defendants in error.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Railway, 228 U. S. 596, 600; see White Star Mining Co. v. Hultberg, 205 U. S. 540; Anderson et al. v. Swedish Evangelical Mission Covenant of America et al., 235 U. S. 692.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 U.S. 605, 35 S. Ct. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-hultberg-scotus-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack