Anderson v. Hording
214 A.D. 826
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that the Board has erroneously included in the weekly wage the amounts received by the claimant-for tips, it not appearing that the same was taken into consideration by the parties in making the contract of employment, and on the authority of Sloat v. Rochester Taxicab Co. (177 App. Div. 57) and Begendorf v. Swift & Co., Inc. (193 id. 404). All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Hording, 214 A.D. 826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
214 A.D. 826 (Anderson v. Hording) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mario Flores v. Carnival Cruise Lines
47 F.3d 1120 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
Hill v. King
663 S.W.2d 435 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1983)
Bryson v. Benton
395 S.W.2d 794 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1965)
Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.
315 U.S. 386 (Supreme Court, 1942)
Ferro v. Leopold Sinsheimer Estate, Inc.
176 N.E. 817 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)