Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Anderson v. Hording

Anderson v. Hording

214 A.D. 826
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 214 A.D. 826 (Anderson v. Hording) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Hording, 214 A.D. 826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that the Board has erroneously included in the weekly wage the amounts received by the claimant-for tips, it not appearing that the same was taken into consideration by the parties in making the contract of employment, and on the authority of Sloat v. Rochester Taxicab Co. (177 App. Div. 57) and Begendorf v. Swift & Co., Inc. (193 id. 404). All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mario Flores v. Carnival Cruise Lines
47 F.3d 1120 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
Hill v. King
663 S.W.2d 435 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1983)
Bryson v. Benton
395 S.W.2d 794 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1965)
Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.
315 U.S. 386 (Supreme Court, 1942)
Ferro v. Leopold Sinsheimer Estate, Inc.
176 N.E. 817 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 A.D. 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-hording-nyappdiv-1925.