Anderson v. Helm

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Anderson v. Helm

581 So. 2d 590, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9020, 1990 WL 186732

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 28, 1990

DocketNo. 90-02825

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 581 So. 2d 590 (Anderson v. Helm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Helm, 581 So. 2d 590, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9020, 1990 WL 186732 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Keith Anderson petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing his court-appointed appellate counsel to relinquish the record on appeal. See, e.g., Bermed v. Tacher, 565 So.2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Mr. Helm, the attorney, represented Anderson in 1979, and was successful in having part of Anderson’s sentence vacated. Anderson v. State, 368 So.2d 427 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). In July, 1990, Anderson wrote Helm requesting the record. Anderson deems Helm’s response, which states that the case file was destroyed after five years pursuant to his employer’s policy, as “unsatisfactory.” We disagree.

Petition denied.

RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur. SCHOONOVER, C.J., concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI