Anderson v. Hathaway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Anderson v. Hathaway

217 A.D.2d 840, 630 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 20, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.D.2d 840 (Anderson v. Hathaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Hathaway, 217 A.D.2d 840, 630 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeals from an order and amended order of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered May 25, 1994 and September 13, 1994 in Warren County, which granted a mo[841]*841tion by defendants Joseph J. Marcino, III and Marcus Noble, Inc. to compel plaintiff to submit to an examination by an occupational rehabilitation expert.

In accordance with our recent decision in Mooney v Osowiecky (215 AD2d 839), we reverse Supreme Court’s orders directing plaintiff to submit to testing and other evaluation by an occupational rehabilitation expert.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order and amended order are reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeals from an order and amended order of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered May 25, 1994 and September 13, 1994 in Warren County, which granted a mo[841]*841tion by defendants Joseph J. Marcino, III and Marcus Noble, Inc. to compel plaintiff to submit to an examination by an occupational rehabilitation expert.

In accordance with our recent decision in Mooney v Osowiecky (215 AD2d 839), we reverse Supreme Court’s orders directing plaintiff to submit to testing and other evaluation by an occupational rehabilitation expert.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order and amended order are reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 A.D.2d 840, 630 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-hathaway-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack