Anderson v. Hancock
61 Cal. 88, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 546
Opinion
The description of the premises in the tax deed appears to us to be sufficient.
It does not appear by the record that there were any erasures in the deed. The copy set out in the bill of exceptions discloses none, and there is no evidence that there were any. The motion for a new trial may have been granted on the ground that no erasures appeared upon the face of the deed.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Hancock, 61 Cal. 88, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 546 (Cal. 1882).
61 Cal. 88 (Anderson v. Hancock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anderson v. Hancock
2 P. 31 (California Supreme Court, 1884)