Anderson v. Hancock
61 Cal. 88, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 546
This text of 61 Cal. 88 (Anderson v. Hancock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Anderson v. Hancock, 61 Cal. 88, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 546 (Cal. 1882).
Opinion
The description of the premises in the tax deed appears to us to be sufficient.
It does not appear by the record that there were any erasures in the deed. The copy set out in the bill of exceptions discloses none, and there is no evidence that there were any. The motion for a new trial may have been granted on the ground that no erasures appeared upon the face of the deed.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Anderson v. Hancock
2 P. 31 (California Supreme Court, 1884)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
61 Cal. 88, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-hancock-cal-1882.