Anderson v. Hackett

316 A.2d 755, 164 Conn. 7, 1972 Conn. LEXIS 640
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 17, 1972
StatusPublished

This text of 316 A.2d 755 (Anderson v. Hackett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Hackett, 316 A.2d 755, 164 Conn. 7, 1972 Conn. LEXIS 640 (Colo. 1972).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action brought in behalf of an eleven-year-old minor against the defendant property owners seeking damages for injuries sustained as the result of a sledding accident on the defendants’ property. The trial court found that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact with respect to liability and that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Practice Book § 303.

On the record before us the granting by the trial court of the motion of the defendants for summary judgment cannot be disturbed. Dougherty v. Graham, 161 Conn. 248, 253, 287 A.2d 382; Bears v. Hovey, 159 Conn. 358, 361, 269 A.2d 77.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dougherty v. Graham
287 A.2d 382 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1971)
Bears v. Hovey
269 A.2d 77 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
316 A.2d 755, 164 Conn. 7, 1972 Conn. LEXIS 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-hackett-conn-1972.