Anderson v. General Motors Corp.

162 S.E.2d 464, 118 Ga. App. 4, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1287
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1968
Docket43611
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 162 S.E.2d 464 (Anderson v. General Motors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. General Motors Corp., 162 S.E.2d 464, 118 Ga. App. 4, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1287 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

Code Ann. § 114-501 (Ga. L. 1937, pp. 230, 233, as last amended, Ga. L. 1963, pp. 141, 153) provides in part: “If in an emergency on account of the employer’s failure to provide the medical or other care as herein specified a physician other than provided by the employer is called to treat the injured employee, the reasonable cost of such service, within the limits of time and amount set forth above, shall be paid by the employer if so ordered by the State Board of. Workmen’s Compensation.” Whether there is an emergency and whether the employer failed to provide medical care for the claimant is *7 a question of fact to be resolved by the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation. Owensby v. Riegel Textile Corp., 104 Ga. App. 800 (123 SE2d 147).

In the case sub judice the board made the following finding of fact: “There was no emergency that required immediate attention of the claimant in this case. In fact, the claimant waited from November 3rd to November 8th, 1965, to go to a doctor of his choice, Dr. Joseph S. Wilson, and from the deposition of Dr. Wilson, it is apparent that nowhere did an emergency exist, but that the claimant needed only additional medical attention to eliminate the pain in his chest, which obviously could have been attended to by Dr. Guffin and Dr. Braswell if. proper request had been made of them to render this service.”

There was some evidence to support the board’s finding and it is therefore conclusive upon this court. Code § 114-710.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Atlanta v. Walker
311 S.E.2d 479 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
K-Mart Corp. v. Anderson
304 S.E.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Armstrong v. Allstate Insurance
217 S.E.2d 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E.2d 464, 118 Ga. App. 4, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-general-motors-corp-gactapp-1968.