Anderson v. First National Bank

103 S.E. 806, 25 Ga. App. 610, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 102
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 13, 1920
Docket11183
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 806 (Anderson v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. First National Bank, 103 S.E. 806, 25 Ga. App. 610, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 102 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

Exception is taken to the overruling and dismissal of an affidavit of illegality in which it was alleged that the fi. fa. was proceeding illegally for the reason that, although it was issued after the filing in the court below of the remittitur from this court, it was issued before the remittitur was made the judgment of that court. Held: The affidavit of illegality presented no valid reason why the proceeding under the fi. fa. should be suspended. Civil Code (1910), § 6217; Knox v. State, 113 Ga. 929 (1) (39 S. E. 330).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur. A. S. Anderson, for plaintiffs in error. W. Woodrum, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knox v. State
39 S.E. 330 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 806, 25 Ga. App. 610, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-first-national-bank-gactapp-1920.