Anderson v. Etheridge

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Anderson v. Etheridge

119 S.E. 437, 31 Ga. App. 101, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 747

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 12, 1923

Docket14524

StatusPublished

This text of 119 S.E. 437 (Anderson v. Etheridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Etheridge, 119 S.E. 437, 31 Ga. App. 101, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 747 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

In this suit upon two cheeks, the sole issue was whether or not, under the testimony of the plaintiff and his witnesses, the consideration was the purchase of a rent note, or, under the testimony of the defendant, the compounding or settlement of a criminal prosecution against the defendant’s tenant, in contravention of section 329 of the Penal Code (1910). The exceptions in the defendant’s motion for new trial being limited to the general grounds, and the evidence being in conflict, this court is without power to reverse the ruling of the trial judge refusing to set aside the verdict and judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

In this suit upon two cheeks, the sole issue was whether or not, under the testimony of the plaintiff and his witnesses, the consideration was the purchase of a rent note, or, under the testimony of the defendant, the compounding or settlement of a criminal prosecution against the defendant’s tenant, in contravention of section 329 of the Penal Code (1910). The exceptions in the defendant’s motion for new trial being limited to the general grounds, and the evidence being in conflict, this court is without power to reverse the ruling of the trial judge refusing to set aside the verdict and judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 S.E. 437, 31 Ga. App. 101, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-etheridge-gactapp-1923.