Anderson v. Engelke

Fort Peck Appellate Court

Anderson v. Engelke

1 Am. Tribal Law 109

CourtFort Peck Appellate Court

DecidedFebruary 21, 1997

DocketNo. 263

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Am. Tribal Law 109 (Anderson v. Engelke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fort Peck Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Engelke, 1 Am. Tribal Law 109 (ftpeckctapp 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER DENYING APPEAL

GARY M. BEAUDRY, Chief Justice.

Upon Petition for Review and Stay of Judgment the Fort Peck Tribal Court of Appeals states the following:

1. That after review of the case we find that Judge Reum had authority to hear this case.

2. That there is no evidence of bias between Judge Reum and the Appellant; further the Tribal Court found a contract existed between the parties and that the appellant herein breached the terms of the contract.

3. We find the appeal is brought on the basis of factual issues fully determined in the lower court.

4. The appellant fails to cite a legal basis for appeal.

NOWTHEREFORE this Court makes the following order:

1.The Petition for Review is hereby denied as being without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI