Anderson v. Durr

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Anderson v. Durr

20 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 538

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County·Decided April 28, 1918·Published

Opinion

Caldwell, J.

The court finds that the plaintiff has, in this county, a letter notifying him he has been elected a member of the New York Stock Exchange. This gives him the privilege of transacting business during certain hours and under certain conditions in a building in New York City and nowhere else.

This mere personal privilege is not, in the opinion of the court, property within the tax laws of Ohio.

Therefore the prayer of the plaintiff will be granted and the temporary injunction heretofore issued will be made pereptual.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caldwell, J.

The court finds that the plaintiff has, in this county, a letter notifying him he has been elected a member of the New York Stock Exchange. This gives him the privilege of transacting business during certain hours and under certain conditions in a building in New York City and nowhere else.

This mere personal privilege is not, in the opinion of the court, property within the tax laws of Ohio.

Therefore the prayer of the plaintiff will be granted and the temporary injunction heretofore issued will be made pereptual.

Anderson v. Durr, 20 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 538 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1918).

Pincite

20 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 538 (Anderson v. Durr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.