Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp.

423 F. App'x 274

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 13, 2011·No. No. 10-1824·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Doris N. Anderson appeals the district court’s order affirming the clerk’s taxation of costs and awarding costs to the Defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp., No. 3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK, 2010 WL 2509904 (W.D.N.C. June 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Doris N. Anderson appeals the district court’s order affirming the clerk’s taxation of costs and awarding costs to the Defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp., No. 3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK, 2010 WL 2509904 (W.D.N.C. June 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp., 423 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

423 F. App'x 274 (Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related