Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp.

328 F. App'x 176

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 2, 2009·No. No. 08-2291·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Doris N. Anderson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp., No. 3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK, 2008 WL 4596238 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Doris N. Anderson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp., No. 3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK, 2008 WL 4596238 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp., 328 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

328 F. App'x 176 (Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.