Anderson v. Dodds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Anderson v. Dodds

262 A.D. 795, 27 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 795 (Anderson v. Dodds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Dodds, 262 A.D. 795, 27 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, St. Lawrence county, dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff, entered upon a verdict of no cause of action rendered by a jury. The plaintiff sought to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of an accident which occurred on the 6th day of November, 1937. The sole contention of the plaintiff upon this appeal is that the verdict was against the weight of evidence. The litigation involved sharp, fully litigated issues of fact as to the negligence of the defendants and the contributory negligence of the plaintiffs, and the verdict of the jury of no cause of action was amply supported by the evidence. The judgment from which this appeal is taken should be affirmed. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Schenek, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, St. Lawrence county, dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff, entered upon a verdict of no cause of action rendered by a jury. The plaintiff sought to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of an accident which occurred on the 6th day of November, 1937. The sole contention of the plaintiff upon this appeal is that the verdict was against the weight of evidence. The litigation involved sharp, fully litigated issues of fact as to the negligence of the defendants and the contributory negligence of the plaintiffs, and the verdict of the jury of no cause of action was amply supported by the evidence. The judgment from which this appeal is taken should be affirmed. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Schenek, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 795, 27 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-dodds-nyappdiv-1941.