Anderson v. DiPrete
102 R.I. 762
Opinion
Motion of plaintiff-appellee entitled “MOTION FOR RE-ARGUMENT AND/OR DISMISSAL OF PROPOSED INTERVENOR’S APPEAL” averring a certain contract had expired, thereby rendering proposed intervenor’s appeal moot and that proposed intervenor had no standing with respect to the appeal, the appellants having notified the Court by letter that it would not answer to the motion or resist it, motion to dismiss granted. Appellee’s motion to “reargue” denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. DiPrete, 102 R.I. 762 (R.I. 1967).
102 R.I. 762 (Anderson v. DiPrete) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.