Anderson v. DiPrete

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Anderson v. DiPrete

102 R.I. 762

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedAugust 8, 1967

DocketAppeal No. 35

StatusPublished

This text of 102 R.I. 762 (Anderson v. DiPrete) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. DiPrete, 102 R.I. 762 (R.I. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of plaintiff-appellee entitled “MOTION FOR RE-ARGUMENT AND/OR DISMISSAL OF PROPOSED INTERVENOR’S APPEAL” averring a certain contract had expired, thereby rendering proposed intervenor’s appeal moot and that proposed intervenor had no standing with respect to the appeal, the appellants having notified the Court by letter that it would not answer to the motion or resist it, motion to dismiss granted. Appellee’s motion to “reargue” denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of plaintiff-appellee entitled “MOTION FOR RE-ARGUMENT AND/OR DISMISSAL OF PROPOSED INTERVENOR’S APPEAL” averring a certain contract had expired, thereby rendering proposed intervenor’s appeal moot and that proposed intervenor had no standing with respect to the appeal, the appellants having notified the Court by letter that it would not answer to the motion or resist it, motion to dismiss granted. Appellee’s motion to “reargue” denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 R.I. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-diprete-ri-1967.