Anderson v. Davis

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 8, 2001
• Docket: 01-1533
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1533

T. JAMES ANDERSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANDRE DAVIS, Honorable, District Court Judge, United States District Court,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 01-1534

ANDRE DAVIS, Honorable, District Court Judge, United States District Court,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01- 846-L, CA-01-906-L)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

T. James Anderson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

T. James Anderson appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaints under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) (West Supp. 2000). We have

reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find

that these appeals present no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v.

Davis, Nos. CA-01-846-L; CA-01-906-L (D. Md. Mar. 26 & 28, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED