Anderson v. Davis

Fourth Circuit

Anderson v. Davis

11 F. App'x 312

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2001·No. Nos. 01-1533, 01-1534·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

T. James Anderson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaints under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find that these appeals present no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. Davis, Nos. CA-01-846-L; CA-01-906-L (D. Md. Mar. 26 & 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

T. James Anderson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaints under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find that these appeals present no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. Davis, Nos. CA-01-846-L; CA-01-906-L (D. Md. Mar. 26 & 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Anderson v. Davis, 11 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

11 F. App'x 312 (Anderson v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related