Anderson v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Anderson v. Cunningham

5 Rob. 211

DecidedJune 15, 1843

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Rob. 211 (Anderson v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Cunningham, 5 Rob. 211 (La. 1843).

Pincite

Opinion

Garland, J.

This case was before us in June,-1842, (2 Robinson, 463,) and was then remanded for a new trial, principally for the purpose of ascertaining whether a sum of $529 62, received by the plaintiffs of Dakin & Dakin, was credited to the defendant, in the account on file. The evidence on that point now satisfactorily shows, that the defendant has a credit for the nett proceeds of Dakin & Dakin’s note. The inferior Judge has fully examined the case, and has,, in our opinion, allowed the defendant every thing he has shown he is entitled to claim.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garland, J.

This case was before us in June,-1842, (2 Robinson, 463,) and was then remanded for a new trial, principally for the purpose of ascertaining whether a sum of $529 62, received by the plaintiffs of Dakin & Dakin, was credited to the defendant, in the account on file. The evidence on that point now satisfactorily shows, that the defendant has a credit for the nett proceeds of Dakin & Dakin’s note. The inferior Judge has fully examined the case, and has,, in our opinion, allowed the defendant every thing he has shown he is entitled to claim.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Rob. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-cunningham-la-1843.