Anderson v. Culver

1947 OK 306, 185 P.2d 918, 199 Okla. 306, 1947 Okla. LEXIS 693
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 21, 1947
DocketNo. 32713
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1947 OK 306 (Anderson v. Culver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Culver, 1947 OK 306, 185 P.2d 918, 199 Okla. 306, 1947 Okla. LEXIS 693 (Okla. 1947).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court and on August 28, 1946, filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendants in error have filed no brief and have offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause may be reversed and remanded, with directions. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to vacate the judgment entered for the plaintiffs below and enter judgment for the defendant as prayed for in the petition in error.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Julius Schmid, Inc. v. McKay
1950 OK 259 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1947 OK 306, 185 P.2d 918, 199 Okla. 306, 1947 Okla. LEXIS 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-culver-okla-1947.