Anderson v. Courtright
This text of 10 N.W. 183 (Anderson v. Courtright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the only question is whether a party claiming under a recorded tax title and notifying the real owner of such claim can be properly sued in ejectment if out of possession.
The statute regulating ejectment allows it to be brought, where premises are vacant, against persons “ claiming title thereto” at the commencement of the suit, and declares that “ all persons claiming any title to the jJi'emises adverse [162]*162to that claimed by the plaintiff, may in all cases be made defendants in such action.” Comp. L. § 6207.
This language covers the case completely.
The judgment must be affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 N.W. 183, 47 Mich. 161, 1881 Mich. LEXIS 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-courtright-mich-1881.