Anderson v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.
945 F.2d 394, 1991 WL 194712
Opinion
945 F.2d 394
Anderson (Marlene, Thomas)
v.
Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, Rhein Braun U.S.,
Monongahela Railway Company, Boggs (David), Pollock (Ewing),
Pollock, Pollock and Thomas, The Upshur Agency, Inc.,
Consolidated Coal Company, Consol-Land Development Company,
Rheinische Braunkohlenwerke, Verkaufsgesellschaft (Maria
Therese), Nixon (Karl)
NO. 90-3486
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
SEP 24, 1991
Appeal From: W.D.Pa.,
Smith, J.,
740 F.Supp. 1126
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co., 945 F.2d 394, 1991 WL 194712 (3d Cir. 1991).
945 F.2d 394 (Anderson v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anderson v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.
740 F. Supp. 1126 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1990)